15. ECONOMIAS DE ESCALA DE LA INVER

15. ECONOMIAS DE ESCALA DE LA INVERSION EN CARRETERAS
Una de las situaciones comunes en los países en desarrollo y en Uruguay es el reparto de los recursos disponibles entre los km de rutas identificados como en peores condiciones y donde la presión social y política es mayor. Esta forma de asignación de recursos, en lugar de asignar recursos en forma racional para maximizar la eficiencia conduce en general a inversiones que resultan débiles para enfrentar las cargas pesadas. En la infraestructura de carreteras, la relación de aumento de la inversión con el aumento de la vida útil sigue una función doble logarítmica. Es decir un pequeño aumento de la inversión en un pavimento, redunda en que se podrán aplicar una cantidad de cargas pesadas significativamente mayores. Aplicando los criterios de AASHTO simplificados, se puede decir que la situación es la que se muestra en la siguiente tabla.
15.1.1 TABLA 19: Costos de Infraestructura y economías de escala
COSTO DE INFRAESTRUCTURA Y ECONOMIAS DE ESCALA

결과 (영어) 1:

15 ECONOMIES OF SCALE OF INVESTMENT IN ROADSA common situation in the developing countries and in Uruguay is the sharing of resources between the km of routes identified as in worse conditions and where social and political pressure is greater. This form of resource allocation, rather than allocating resources in a rational manner to maximize efficiency in general leads to investments that are weak to deal with heavy loads. On the road infrastructure, increased investment relationship with the increase of the useful life follows a double logarithmic function. That means a small increase in investment on a pavement, it is in that a number of heavy significantly greater loads may be applied. Applying the criteria of AASHTO simplified, can say that the situation is shown in the following table.15.1.1 table 19: infrastructure costs and economies of scaleCOST OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIES OF SCALE

결과 (영어) 2:

15. ECONOMIES OF SCALE OF THE INVESTMENT IN HIGHWAY
A common situations in developing countries and in Uruguay is the sharing of resources between km of routes identified as worse and where the social and political pressure is greatest. This form of resource allocation, instead of allocating resources in a rational way to maximize efficiency generally leads to investments that are weak to cope with heavy loads. In road infrastructure, the ratio of increase in investment with increasing the life follows a double logarithmic function. It ie a small increase in investment on a pavement, results that can be applied in an amount significantly higher loads. Applying the criteria of AASHTO simplified, one can say that the situation is shown in the table below.
15.1.1 Table 19: Infrastructure costs and economies of scale
infrastructure cost and economies of scale

결과 (영어) 3:

15. Economies of scale in Investment in Roads
a of the common situations in developing countries and in Uruguay is the allocation of available resources among the km of routes identified in worse conditions and where the Social and political pressure is greater. This allocation of resourcesInstead of allocating Resources in a Rational way to maximize Efficiency generally leads to investments that are weak to face the heavy loads. In the infrastructure of Roads, the relationship of Investment Increase with the increase of the useful Life follows a double logarithmic function. That is to say, a small increase of the investment in a PavementIt is in that it may apply a significantly greater amount of heavy loads. Using the criteria of AASHTO Simplified, it can be said that the situation is shown in the following table: Table 19.
15.1.1 Infrastructure costs and economies of scale and the cost of Infrastructure and economies of scale