Como puede verse en la tabla, el po

Como puede verse en la tabla, el porcentaje del PBI destinado a la inversión vial del MTOP pasó de un 6 por mil en 2000, cuando ya se habían experimentado recortes como consecuencia de la devaluación de Brasil de 1999, a un promedio de 3 por mil en los últimos 6 años de PBI creciente.
La recuperación del porcentaje sobre el PBI, permitiría en la actualidad duplicar la asignación presupuestal a USD 434.000.000 (a precios de 2011) y con ello haber recuperado y superado el nivel de lo que hemos denominado presupuesto estacionario, compuesto de USD 217.500.000 de reinversión, USD 43.500.000 de mantenimiento y USD 20.000.000 de apoyo a las Intendencias que totalizan USD 281.000.000.
El planteamiento de recuperación de la inversión vial, llevaría a destinar USD 787.000.000 que representan sobre el PBI de 2011 un 1,5% durante 5 años, para retornar al 6 por mil del PBI actual al cabo de la recuperación del rezago.
En síntesis, el presupuesto que se ha previsto no resulta de una ambición de crecimiento o de mayor participación sobre el PBI, sino recuperar la tradición de asignación de recursos y en el corto plazo recuperar lo perdido desde 1999 hasta la fecha.
Dado que hemos supuesto una elasticidad unitaria del crecimiento del PBI con el crecimiento del tránsito y este determina el crecimiento del consumo de combustible, si la economía crece al 3,5% anual, el combustible y el correspondiente impuesto (en caso que no haya variación de porcentuales) crecerán al mismo ritmo y los recursos serán suficientes para atender la demanda del mantenimiento, la reinversión y la atención de las obras nuevas.
14.1.2 TABLA 18: Evolución estimada de requerimientos presupuestales
EVOLUCION ESTIMADA DE REQUERIMIENTOS PRESUPUESTALES DESDE 2015 A 2030 CRECIMIENTO 0,035

결과 (영어) 1:

As you can see in the table, the percentage of GDP earmarked for the road the MTOP investment spent 6 per thousand in 2000, when already cuts had undergone as a result of the devaluation in Brazil in 1999, an average of 3 per thousand in the last 6 years of increasing GDP.Recovery of the percent of GDP, would currently doubling the budget allocation to USD 434.000.000 (at 2011 prices) and thus have regained and surpassed the level of what we have called budget stationary, consisting of USD 217.500.000 of reinvestment, USD 43.500.000 for maintenance and USD 20,000,000 in support of the municipalities that they totalled USD 281.000.000.The approach of the road investment recovery, would lead to allocate USD 787.000.000 representing on 2011 GDP by 1.5% over 5 years, to return to 6 per thousand of the current GDP at the end of the recovery of the neglected.In synthesis, the budget envisaged is not an ambition of growth or greater participation on GDP, but recover the tradition of resource allocation and short-term recover what was lost since 1999 to date.Since we assumed a unitary elasticity of GDP with the growth of traffic growth and the growth of fuel consumption, this determines if the economy grows at 3.5% per year, the fuel and the tax (in case that there is no variation in percentage) will grow at the same pace and resources will be sufficient to meet the demand for maintenance reinvestment and the attention of the new works.14.1.2 table 18: estimated evolution of budgetary requirementsEVOLUTION ESTIMATED BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS FROM 2015 TO 2030 GROWTH 0.035

결과 (영어) 2:

As shown in the table, the percentage of GDP allocated to road MTOP investment rose from 6 per thousand in 2000, when it had experienced cuts as a result of the Brazilian devaluation of 1999, to an average of 3 per thousand in the last 6 years of increasing GDP.
The recovery percentage of GDP today would double the budget of USD 434 million (at 2011 prices) allocation and thus have regained and surpassed the level of what we call stationary budget, consisting of USD 217.5 million reinvestment, maintenance USD 43,500,000 and USD 20,000,000 Municipalities support totaling USD 281 million.
The recovery approach road investment, leading to allocate USD 787,000. representing 000 of the GDP of 2011 by 1.5% over five years, to return to the current 6 per thousand after recovery lag GDP.
In short, the budget has not provided a growth ambition or greater share of the GDP, but to recover the tradition of allocating resources and in the short term recoup their losses from 1999 to date.
Since we have assumed a unitary elasticity of GDP growth with the growth of traffic and this determines the Fuel consumption growth if the economy grows by 3.5%, fuel and the corresponding tax (if there is no change in percentage) grow at the same pace and resources are sufficient to meet the demand for maintenance, reinvestment and attention of new works.
14.1.2 Table 18: Estimated budgetary requirements Evolution
EVOLUTION ESTIMATED BUDGET REQUIREMENTS FROM 2015 TO 2030 GROWTH 0,035

결과 (영어) 3:

As can be seen in the table, the percentage of GDP spent on road investment of MTOP was 6 per thousand in 2000, when they had already experienced cuts as a result of the devaluation of Brazil in 1999, an average of 3 per thousand in the last 6 years of GDP growing
Recovery percentage. On the GDP,At present would duplicate the budgetary allocation to 434.000.000 (USD in 2011 prices) and thus have recovered and exceeded the level of what we have called The Stationary budget, consisting of USD 217.500.000 Reinvestment and $20000000 USD 43.500.000 maintenance support to municipalities totaling USD 281.000.000.
The approach of Investment Recovery Road would Allocate $787.000.000 represent over 2011 GDP of 1.5% for 5 years, to return to 6 per thousand of GDP current after the Recovery of the Gap. In summary, the budget that has been provided is not a growth or Ambition increased participation on the GDP,But to recover the tradition of allocation of resources and in the short term to recover lost since 1999.
because we have assumed a Unitary Elasticity of GDP growth with the growth of traffic and this determines the growth of fuel consumption if the economy grows at 3.5% per year,The Fuel and the corresponding tax (in case there is no change in percentage) will grow at the same rate and resources will be sufficient to meet the demand of maintenance, Reinvestment and the attention of New Works.
14.1.2 Table 18: Evolution of estimated budgetary requirements Evolution
estimated budgetary requirements from 2015 to 2030 Growth 0,035